Slender Column & Shear Wall Check — Moment Magnification and Biaxial P–M

Checks a rectangular column or wall pier for every ETABS load combination at once: nonsway moment magnification δns about both axes, the 1.4 second-order limit, and biaxial strength against P–M interaction curves built from every bar. Import the loads from an ETABS export or straight from the model.

ACI 318-08
Save calculationFree account — your numbers come with you.

Member and materials

Section and bars

Clear spacing: long face 1.33 in (min 1.00, c/c ≤ 18.0), short face 2.02 in (min 1.00).

Slenderness

Loads

Example: pier P3 @ 2ND (12 of 182 combos)

12 combinations: 12 strength (checked) · 0 service · 1 ignored for δns

Loads stay in this browser. A saved or shared link carries the section and settings above, not the load table.

Export

NOT ADEQUATE — REDESIGN OR JUSTIFY

Example: pier P3 @ 2ND (12 of 182 combos) · 12 combinations · Eq. 10-14

  • PASSStrength — biaxial DCR ≤ 1.0Max 0.444 (142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6): 0.25 weak + 0.19 strong, M2,min on the weak axis
  • FAILSlenderness — δns ≤ 1.4, stableMax δns 2.451 after ignores · 6 over 1.4
  • PASSReinforcement — 1% ≤ ρg ≤ 8%ρg = 4.78%
  • PASSBar spacing — ACI 318-08 §7.6, §14.3.5Clear 1.33 in along h (min 1.00), 2.02 in across b (min 1.00)

What would change the answer

  • Worst: 142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6 — δns 2.45 on a first-order moment of 14.1 kip·ft (weak axis).
  • 6 of the 6 failures have a first-order moment below the code minimum M2,min — the magnified moment comes from the minimum eccentricity, not from the analysis. Their largest strength DCR is 0.44. These are the usual candidates to accept by judgement: review each, then tick Ignore in the δns table.
  • A thickness of b = 18 in passes the slenderness check with everything else unchanged.
  • Or brace the weak axis: an unsupported length of lu = 17.5 ft or less passes.

EI options, ACI 318-08 §10.10.6.1

EIMax δns> 1.4UnstableMax DCR
Eq. 10-142.45600.444in use
Eq. 10-15101
Eq. 10-81.52400.345

ACI 318-08 permits any of the three. Eq. 10-8 takes I per combination from its own Pu and Mu, between 0.35Ig and 0.875Ig. The results can differ widely — pick the one you will defend, not the one that passes.

Cross-section

s = 2.32 in c/c · clear 1.331.00 · c/c ≤ 18.0h = 100.0 in · 42 bars per faceAcross b: 3.00 in c/c · clear 2.021.00 b = 14.0 inM3 — strong axis (in plane), depth hM2 — weak, depth b
Wall pier 14.0 × 100.0 in88 bars Ø25 mm, As = 66.96 in²ρg = 4.78%cover to bar centre 2.50 in

Long section

Weak axis — M2 (out of plane)Pu = 1,763 kiplu = 24.0 ft, k = 1.00-8.8-14.1Single curvature · klu/r = 68.6 > 26.5Cm = 0.85 · M2,min = 150 kip·ftδns = 2.451 → Mc = 367.3 kip·ftM, kip·ft · ▬ McStrong axis — M3 (in plane)Pu = 1,763 kiplu = 24.0 ft, k = 1.00-395.1-1,908.4Single curvature · klu/r = 9.6 31.5Slenderness neglected (Eq. 10-7)Mc = M2 = 1,908.4 kip·ftM, kip·ft · ▬ Mc

P–M interaction, every combination

Weak axis (M2)05,00010,00001,0002,000φMn, |Mc| (kip·ft)φPn, Pu (kip)φPn,max 6,059111 1.4D-1 Pu = 1,886 kip, |Mc| = 160.3 kip·ft φMn = 1,442.3, DCR = 0.111121 1.2D+1.6L-1 Pu = 1,760 kip, |Mc| = 149.6 kip·ft φMn = 1,456.6, DCR = 0.103141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-2 Pu = 1,471 kip, |Mc| = 125.1 kip·ft φMn = 1,489.2, DCR = 0.084141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-7 Pu = 1,573 kip, |Mc| = 156.8 kip·ft φMn = 1,477.7, DCR = 0.106141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-10 Pu = 1,675 kip, |Mc| = 270.0 kip·ft φMn = 1,466.2, DCR = 0.184131 1.2D+0.8WX-8 Pu = 1,430 kip, |Mc| = 262.8 kip·ft φMn = 1,493.8, DCR = 0.176151 1.2D+1.0EX+0.5L+λD-1 Pu = 1,560 kip, |Mc| = 197.2 kip·ft φMn = 1,479.1, DCR = 0.133162 0.9D-1.6WX-2 Pu = 1,403 kip, |Mc| = 240.7 kip·ft φMn = 1,497.0, DCR = 0.161164 0.9D-1.6WY-1 Pu = 1,403 kip, |Mc| = 240.7 kip·ft φMn = 1,497.0, DCR = 0.161174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-3 Pu = 1,269 kip, |Mc| = 178.2 kip·ft φMn = 1,515.7, DCR = 0.118174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-1 Pu = 1,282 kip, |Mc| = 111.1 kip·ft φMn = 1,513.8, DCR = 0.073142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6 Pu = 1,763 kip, |Mc| = 367.3 kip·ft φMn = 1,456.3, DCR = 0.252
φPn–φMn Pn–Mn nominal DCR ≤ 0.85 ≤ 1.0 > 1.0 ignored for δns
Strong axis (M3)05,00010,00005,00010,00015,000φMn, |Mc| (kip·ft)φPn, Pu (kip)φPn,max 6,059111 1.4D-1 Pu = 1,886 kip, |Mc| = 438.6 kip·ft φMn = 9,604.2, DCR = 0.046121 1.2D+1.6L-1 Pu = 1,760 kip, |Mc| = 417.9 kip·ft φMn = 9,950.3, DCR = 0.042141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-2 Pu = 1,471 kip, |Mc| = 1,465.4 kip·ft φMn = 10,701.1, DCR = 0.137141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-7 Pu = 1,573 kip, |Mc| = 2,229.5 kip·ft φMn = 10,459.3, DCR = 0.213141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-10 Pu = 1,675 kip, |Mc| = 1,518.3 kip·ft φMn = 10,185.3, DCR = 0.149131 1.2D+0.8WX-8 Pu = 1,430 kip, |Mc| = 94.7 kip·ft φMn = 10,799.8, DCR = 0.009151 1.2D+1.0EX+0.5L+λD-1 Pu = 1,560 kip, |Mc| = 689.7 kip·ft φMn = 10,489.4, DCR = 0.066162 0.9D-1.6WX-2 Pu = 1,403 kip, |Mc| = 2,136.4 kip·ft φMn = 10,864.4, DCR = 0.197164 0.9D-1.6WY-1 Pu = 1,403 kip, |Mc| = 2,136.4 kip·ft φMn = 10,864.4, DCR = 0.197174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-3 Pu = 1,269 kip, |Mc| = 1,791.0 kip·ft φMn = 11,180.9, DCR = 0.160174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-1 Pu = 1,282 kip, |Mc| = 1,756.4 kip·ft φMn = 11,150.6, DCR = 0.158142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6 Pu = 1,763 kip, |Mc| = 1,908.4 kip·ft φMn = 9,941.9, DCR = 0.192
φPn–φMn Pn–Mn nominal DCR ≤ 0.85 ≤ 1.0 > 1.0 ignored for δns

Moment magnifier δns

1.01.52.02.5101001,000δns = 1.4 limit (§10.10.2.1)First-order |M2| (kip·ft, log scale)δns111 1.4D-1 (M2) |M2| = 42.6 kip·ft, δns = 1.000111 1.4D-1 (M3) |M2| = 438.6 kip·ft, δns = 1.000121 1.2D+1.6L-1 (M2) |M2| = 41.8 kip·ft, δns = 1.000121 1.2D+1.6L-1 (M3) |M2| = 417.9 kip·ft, δns = 1.000141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-2 (M2) |M2| = 72.6 kip·ft, δns = 1.000141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-2 (M3) |M2| = 1,465.4 kip·ft, δns = 1.000141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-7 (M2) |M2| = 112.2 kip·ft, δns = 1.173141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-7 (M3) |M2| = 2,229.5 kip·ft, δns = 1.000141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-10 (M2) |M2| = 22.7 kip·ft, δns = 1.896 ignored for the 1.4 limit141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-10 (M3) |M2| = 1,518.3 kip·ft, δns = 1.000 ignored for the 1.4 limit142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6 (M2) |M2| = 14.1 kip·ft, δns = 2.451142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6 (M3) |M2| = 1,908.4 kip·ft, δns = 1.000131 1.2D+0.8WX-8 (M2) |M2| = 12.9 kip·ft, δns = 2.162131 1.2D+0.8WX-8 (M3) |M2| = 94.7 kip·ft, δns = 1.000151 1.2D+1.0EX+0.5L+λD-1 (M2) |M2| = 48.3 kip·ft, δns = 1.487151 1.2D+1.0EX+0.5L+λD-1 (M3) |M2| = 689.7 kip·ft, δns = 1.000162 0.9D-1.6WX-2 (M2) |M2| = 7.0 kip·ft, δns = 2.019162 0.9D-1.6WX-2 (M3) |M2| = 2,136.4 kip·ft, δns = 1.000164 0.9D-1.6WY-1 (M2) |M2| = 7.0 kip·ft, δns = 2.019164 0.9D-1.6WY-1 (M3) |M2| = 2,136.4 kip·ft, δns = 1.000174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-3 (M2) |M2| = 8.1 kip·ft, δns = 1.653174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-3 (M3) |M2| = 1,791.0 kip·ft, δns = 1.000174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-1 (M2) |M2| = 11.5 kip·ft, δns = 1.020174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-1 (M3) |M2| = 1,756.4 kip·ft, δns = 1.000
weak axis (M2) strong axis (M3) above 1.4 (unstable pinned to the top)

Biaxial DCR

Worst 12 of 12 combinations142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-60.44142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6 DCR2 = 0.252, DCR3 = 0.192 (M2,min on the weak axis)162 0.9D-1.6WX-20.36162 0.9D-1.6WX-2 DCR2 = 0.161, DCR3 = 0.197 (M2,min on the weak axis)164 0.9D-1.6WY-10.36164 0.9D-1.6WY-1 DCR2 = 0.161, DCR3 = 0.197 (M2,min on the weak axis)141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-100.33141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-10 DCR2 = 0.184, DCR3 = 0.149 (M2,min on the weak axis)141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-70.32141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-7 DCR2 = 0.106, DCR3 = 0.213 (M2,min on the weak axis)174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-30.28174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-3 DCR2 = 0.118, DCR3 = 0.160 (M2,min on the weak axis)174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-10.23174 0.9D-1.0EY-λD-1 DCR2 = 0.073, DCR3 = 0.158 (M2,min on the weak axis)141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-20.22141 1.2D+1.6WX+0.5L-2 DCR2 = 0.084, DCR3 = 0.137 (M2,min on the weak axis)151 1.2D+1.0EX+0.5L+λD-10.20151 1.2D+1.0EX+0.5L+λD-1 DCR2 = 0.133, DCR3 = 0.066 (M2,min on the weak axis)131 1.2D+0.8WX-80.18131 1.2D+0.8WX-8 DCR2 = 0.176, DCR3 = 0.009 (M2,min on the weak axis)111 1.4D-10.16111 1.4D-1 DCR2 = 0.111, DCR3 = 0.046 (M2,min on the weak axis)121 1.2D+1.6L-10.14121 1.2D+1.6L-1 DCR2 = 0.103, DCR3 = 0.042 (M2,min on the weak axis)1.0
DCR2 = |Mc2| / φMn2 DCR3 = |Mc3| / φMn3

δns over 1.4 or unstable — 7 combinations

Ticking Ignore is engineering judgement: it takes the combination out of the δns ≤ 1.4 limit only. Its magnified moment and strength DCR stay in the check. Unstable combinations can't be ignored.

CombinationAxisM1M2M2,minCmδnsDCRIgnore
M2-5.0-22.7142.40.6891.8960.333
M2-8.8-14.1149.90.8482.4510.444
M2-11.8-12.9121.50.9662.1620.185
M21.3-48.3132.60.5891.4870.199
M2-7.0-7.0119.20.9982.0190.357
M2-7.0-7.0119.20.9982.0190.357
M2-6.0-8.1107.80.8981.6530.278

Design checks

CheckDemandCapacityDCRStatus
Biaxial strength DCR2 + DCR3 (142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6)0.4441.000.444✓ OK
Second-order limit δns ≤ 1.4 (1 ignored)2.4511.401.751✗ FAIL
Stability Pu < 0.75Pc0.7301.000.730✓ OK
Reinforcement ρg ≥ 1%1.00 %4.78 %0.209✓ OK
Reinforcement ρg ≤ 8%4.78 %8.00 %0.598✓ OK
Clear bar spacing, long face h ≥ 1 in (§7.6.1)1.00 in1.33 in0.750✓ OK
Vertical bar spacing, long face h ≤ min(3b, 18 in)2.32 in18.00 in0.129✓ OK
Clear bar spacing, short face b ≥ 1 in (§7.6.1)1.00 in2.02 in0.496✓ OK

Calculation

  1. 1Longitudinal steelACI318 10.9.1
    A_{st} = (2n_b + 2n_h - 4)\,\tfrac{\pi}{4}d_b^2, \quad \rho_g = A_{st}/A_g
    A_{st} = 88 \times 0.761 = 66.96, \quad \rho_g = 66.96 / 1400 = 4.780\%
    \rho_g4.78 %
  2. 2Concrete modulus and stress-block factorACI318 10.2
    E_c = 57{,}000\sqrt{f'_c}, \quad \beta_1 = 0.85 - 0.05\,\frac{f'_c - 4000}{1000}
    E_c = 4415\text{ ksi}, \quad \beta_1 = 0.750
    E_c4415 ksi
  3. 3Weak axis (M2): gross and steel moments of inertia
    I_g = \frac{w D^3}{12}, \quad I_{se} = \sum A_{s,i}\,(d_i - D/2)^2
    I_g = \frac{100.0 \times 14.0^3}{12} = 22867, \quad I_{se} = 1301\text{ in}^4 \;(4\text{ layers})
    I_g22867 in⁴
  4. 4Weak axis (M2), largest δns — "142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6": slenderness limitACI318 Eq. (10-7)
    \frac{k l_u}{r} > 34 - 12\,\frac{M_1}{M_2} \;(\le 40), \quad r = 0.3D
    \frac{1 \times 24 \times 12}{0.3 \times 14} = 68.600 > 34 - 12\,\frac{-8.770}{-14.120} = 26.500
    k l_u / r68.6

    Slenderness must be considered for every compression combination on this axis.

  5. 5Weak axis (M2): equivalent moment factorACI318 10.10.6.4
    C_m = 0.6 + 0.4\,\frac{M_1}{M_2}
    C_m = 0.6 + 0.4\,\frac{-8.770}{-14.120} = 0.848
    C_{m2}0.848

    From the analysed end moments, M1/M2 positive in single curvature; taken as 0 when both are zero. The minimum moment does not enter Cm.

  6. 6Weak axis (M2): flexural stiffness, Eq. 10-14ACI318 10.10.6.1
    EI = \frac{0.2E_cI_g + E_sI_{se}}{1 + \beta_{dns}}
    \beta_{dns} = 0.917, \quad EI = 30215441
    EI30215441 kip·in²
  7. 7Weak axis (M2): critical load and magnifierACI318 10.10.6
    P_c = \frac{\pi^2 EI}{(k l_u)^2}, \quad \delta_{ns} = \frac{C_m}{1 - P_u / 0.75P_c} \ge 1.0
    P_c = \frac{\pi^2 \times 30215441}{(1 \times 24 \times 12)^2} = 3595, \quad \delta_{ns} = \frac{0.848}{1 - 1763/(0.75 \times 3595)} = 2.451
    \delta_{ns2}2.451
  8. 8Weak axis (M2): design moment for strengthACI318 10.10.6.5
    M_{2,min} = P_u(0.6 + 0.03h), \quad M_c = \delta_{ns} \max(|M_2|, M_{2,min})
    M_{2,min} = \frac{1763(0.6 + 0.03 \times 14)}{12} = 149.9, \quad M_c = 2.451 \times 149.900 = 367.3
    M_{c2}367.3 kip·ft
  9. 9Strong axis (M3): gross and steel moments of inertia
    I_g = \frac{w D^3}{12}, \quad I_{se} = \sum A_{s,i}\,(d_i - D/2)^2
    I_g = \frac{14.0 \times 100.0^3}{12} = 1166667, \quad I_{se} = 57279\text{ in}^4 \;(42\text{ layers})
    I_g1166667 in⁴
  10. 10Strong axis (M3): slenderness may be neglected for every combination (tightest: "111 1.4D-1")ACI318 Eq. (10-7)
    \frac{k l_u}{r} \le 34 - 12\,\frac{M_1}{M_2} \le 40, \quad r = 0.3D
    \frac{1 \times 24 \times 12}{0.3 \times 100} = 9.600 \le 26.100
    k l_u / r9.6

    First-order moments are used as they are: no magnifier and no minimum moment.

  11. 11Maximum design axial strengthACI318 10.3.6
    \phi P_{n,max} = 0.80\phi\left[0.85f'_c(A_g - A_{st}) + f_yA_{st}\right]
    \phi P_{n,max} = 0.80 \times 0.65 \times 11653 = 6059
    \phi P_{n,max}6059 kip
  12. 12Biaxial strength, governing combination — "142 1.2D-1.6WX+0.5L-6", minimum moment about the weak axisACI318 10.3
    DCR = \frac{|M_{c2}|}{\phi M_{n2}} + \frac{|M_{c3}|}{\phi M_{n3}}
    DCR = \frac{367.300}{1456.300} + \frac{1908.400}{9941.900} = 0.444
    DCR0.444

    The minimum moment is applied about one axis at a time: each combination is checked with M2,min on the weak axis and the strong axis on its analysed moment, then the reverse, and the larger sum governs.

  13. 13Bar spacing along the long face hACI318 7.6.1
    s_{clear} = s - w_{bar} \ge s_{min}
    s = 2.32, \quad s_1.33 = 1.33, \quad s_1.00 = 1.00
    s_{clear}1.33 in

    Governing minimum: 1 in (§7.6.1).

  14. 14Bar spacing along the short face bACI318 7.6.1
    s_{clear} = s - w_{bar} \ge s_{min}
    s = 3.00, \quad s_2.02 = 2.02, \quad s_1.00 = 1.00
    s_{clear}2.02 in

    Governing minimum: 1 in (§7.6.1).

Notes

  • 7 combinations exceed δns = 1.4 or are unstable; 6 still count against the limit. A large δns on a very small first-order moment is often harmless — check its strength DCR before accepting it.

Assumptions

  • Nonsway (braced) member: first-order end moments from the analysis are magnified by δns only; sway magnification δs is not applied.
  • Slenderness is neglected, per axis and combination, where klu/r ≤ 34 − 12(M1/M2) ≤ 40 with r = 0.3h (Eq. 10-7); M1/M2 is taken as 0 when both end moments are zero. Such a combination is checked on its first-order moment, without the minimum moment — as PCA Notes Example 11.1 does.
  • Cm is taken from the analysed end moments with no lower bound; the minimum moment M2,min only raises the moment that is magnified and checked for strength.
  • Rectangular section with bars on the perimeter only, equally spaced along each face; the corner bars are counted once.
  • Axial load per combination is taken at the end with the larger compression (the bottom, for gravity-dominated combinations).
  • βdns is taken as the combination's dead-load coefficient (read from its name, with ±Ev for the λD combinations) times Pu,1.4D / 1.4, over its Pu, capped at 1.0 — the owner's method.
  • Biaxial strength by the linear interaction DCR2 + DCR3 ≤ 1.0 (ACI SP-17) — conservative relative to a full P–M–M surface. The minimum moment is applied about one axis at a time (the other axis on its analysed moment, magnified); the worse of the two cases governs.
  • Tied member: φ = 0.65 in compression rising to 0.90 at εt = 0.005; φPn capped at 0.80φPo.

What this calculator does not check

  • Does not check sway frames (δs), shear, boundary elements or special structural wall detailing (Chapter 21), splices, or tie and confinement spacing.
  • Does not check the §14.3 minimum wall reinforcement; the 1%–8% range checked here is the compression-member limit.
  • Bar spacing is checked between adjacent bars along each face; it does not check lap splices, cover over bundles (§7.6.6.6), or that every corner and alternate bar is held by a tie (§7.10.5.3).
  • Ignoring a combination removes it from the δns ≤ 1.4 limit only — its magnified moment and strength DCR stay in the check. An unstable combination (Pu ≥ 0.75Pc) cannot be ignored.

Results are for preliminary sizing and educational use. They are not a design and must be reviewed, verified and sealed by a licensed or registered engineer before being used in construction.

slender-column-wall-check v1.2.0 · ACI 318-08 · input 9965c84c23322475

All combinations